|
September 2001
|
|
Fiduciary Risk Management
|
|
By David J. Witz, Geller Group Ltd.
|
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) governs a complex and
challenging environment. Lawsuits and benefit claims are increasingly
brought against ERISA fiduciaries, subjecting them to personal liability
and extensive, time-consuming legal proceedings. Plan sponsors can minimize
the exposure of their fiduciaries to litigation, reduce the cost of insurance,
and enhance the administration of employee benefit programs through sound
risk management practices.
Fiduciary Responsibilities
A fiduciary is any person named in the plan instrument or any person who
exercises any discretionary authority or control with respect to the plan's
management or assets. Fiduciaries typically include the plan sponsor and
its trustees, but may include others. The definition of an ERISA fiduciary
is deliberately broad and extends beyond the common-law definition to
encompass all individuals that might be responsible for the misuse of plan
assets or for a loss to plan participants.
The most frequently alleged claims against ERISA fiduciaries include a denial
or change of benefits, administrative error, incorrect benefit calculation,
improper advice or counsel, misleading
representation, wrongful termination of plan, denial of one's civil rights,
failure to adequately fund a benefit program, conflict of interest, and
imprudent investment. The employees participating in a program bring the
majority of fiduciary claims.
The ERISA fiduciary is ultimately responsible
for negligence and the failure to administer a plan according to its terms.
Participant claims often arise as a result of receiving a lesser benefit
than expected, whether resulting from improper administration or
inadequate communication. A vague or imprecise summary
plan description has often resulted in the payment of benefits not due
under the tenns of the plan document.
Fiduciary liability.
Fiduciaries that have breached an ERISA fiduciary responsibility
provision are personally liable for any resulting lawsuits, and may
also be liable for statutory penalties and reasonable attorney fees.
Fiduciary liability may also arise from errors or omissions by the
fiduciary or a cofiduciary. A lawsuit establishing liability may be
brought by the Department of Labor, any plan participant or beneficiary,
or another plan fiduciary.
Fiduciary delegation.
Fiduciaries are generally not liable for a breach of an ERISA fiduciary
duty if that duty has been specifically delegated to another fiduciary.
The plan document must specifically authorize the delegation of fiduciary
duty and the fiduciary must exercise reasonable prudence in delegating
responsibilities.
ERISA fiduciaries often delegate the responsibility for establishing and
overseeing plan asset investments. ERISA restricts such delegation to an
investment manager that is a registered investment advisor, a bank, or
a qualified insurance company, and the
investment manager must acknowledge its fiduciary status in writing.
Fiduciaries must act prudently in monitoring delegated responsibility.
Fiduciaries must evaluate the performance of the appointee and the
appropriateness of continuing that delegation, typically through an
annual fiduciary review and an investment policy statement.
ERISA fiduciaries often delegate administrative functions to service providers,
which generally are not fiduciaries. Nonetheless, service providers
should have written agreements clearly defining their responsibilities.
Plan sponsors should consult qualified counsel for guidance in satisfying
fiduciary conduct when delegating and they should document their fiduciary
conduct, particularly for actions related to investment decisions.
Risk Management Practices
ERISA fiduciaries must ensure that plan and trust
documents and sununary plan descriptions fully comply with applicable
laws and reflect actual plan operation. Periodic opinions of legal counsel
about the conformity of the plan document and
its actual operation, including compliance with the applicable statutory
requirements and tax qualification provisions, will ensure the accuracy
and completeness of regulated filings and communication with plan
participants.
Plan sponsors should draft their trust agreements to provide
maximum indemnification for ERISA fiduciaries. Prototype plan documentation
indemnification provisions are often inadequate and fail to safeguard the
plan sponsor's interests.
The employee benefit plan is required to bond any
fiduciary and all other persons that handle plan assets. Fidelity bonds
reimburse the plan for losses arising from dishonesty but do not protect
fiduciaries to the extent claims are made against them. ERISA fiduciaries
cannot rely solely upon the fidelity bond and indemnification provided
by the plan sponsor. For example, the plan sponsor may become insolvent
and unable to pay losses and expenses incurred by the fiduciary. Alternatively,
a plan sponsor's board of directors may modify the indemnification provisions
to limit protection for fiduciaries.
Fiduciary insurance should be purchased
by the employer and not by the plan; if purchased by the plan, the insurer
is permitted to recoup its loss from the fiduciary if a breach of fiduciary
duty occurs.
If the plan sponsor provides joint coverage of ERISA fiduciaries
along with its directors and officers under a single policy, it should be
examined to ensure that the intended coverage for ERISA fiduciaries exists
and be tested to evaluate the effect of the erosion of the liability limit
that occurs when combining two different insurance programs and classes of
insured into one policy.
ERISA compliance audits.
ERISA compliance audits
that inspect and evaluate actual plan operation are an efficient means for
plan sponsors to fulfill their obligations for document adequacy, tax
compliance, accurate communication to participants and government authorities,
and the maintenance of plan procedures. In addition to identifying potential
problems in actual plan operation, a compliance audit demonstrates sound
business judgment by ERISA fiduciaries and emphasizes to all the necessity
for compliance with legal requirements.
|